Sony PSP, PS3, PS2 & Playstation Cheats, News, Reviews, Walkthroughs


Go Back   PSX Extreme & Xbox Nerds Forums > Life > Off-topic Forum
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-2005, 07:38 AM   #101
Gabriel013
ArchAngel
 
Gabriel013's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sheffield, England
PS3 Network ID: gabriel013
Xbox Live ID: Gabriel013
Posts: 6,689
Send a message via Yahoo to Gabriel013
Default

going for film over digital?

can you tell a difference in printed image quality?
__________________
\"...and he shall ascend from the fires of Hell...\"
"everyone knows second hand squirrel kills." - Svosen

3 forum tokens
Gabriel013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2005, 07:59 AM   #102
Norrec
A little left of center
 
Norrec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Streetsboro, OH
Xbox Live ID: xakdublin
Posts: 1,668
Send a message via AIM to Norrec Send a message via MSN to Norrec Send a message via Yahoo to Norrec
Default

Well, I'm into B&W lab photography. And the quality really depends on how/what you shoot. Faster speed film is grainier, lower = smoother, sometimes you might want grainy to be honest. Size of the image can be changed in the darkroom on a great scale if you get some sharp images. Also, the feel of a finished photograph that you shot, developed, enlarged, developed to photo paper yourself... well, It's pretty nice.. haha
There are so many variances in quality for film images, so I can't really compare dig and film for you (sometimes better, sometimes not as good). But film gives you so much more freedom, and a better feeling.

I wouldn't mind a Nikon D100, a really nice Digi SLR cam, or one Fuji SLR I saw with 12 (!) megapixels.. But way out of my price range for a while.

Also, (added after I wrote all this so I wouldnt have to find a suitable place for it in the paragraph) Digi prints you either have to print yourself (low quality inless you have a truly highend printer) or take it to and everyday film processing place (quality is good if the image is good, but costs $$ (££ for you, haha))

I wrote too much.

As long as I'm here, I forgot I bought Jon Stewarts book 'Naked Pictures of Famous People' the other day. Very funny so far.
__________________
Norrec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2005, 02:05 AM   #103
Gabriel013
ArchAngel
 
Gabriel013's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sheffield, England
PS3 Network ID: gabriel013
Xbox Live ID: Gabriel013
Posts: 6,689
Send a message via Yahoo to Gabriel013
Default

Thanks for the info Norrec.

I guess if you're developing them yourself then that's a different matter. I can understand why you'd take filmn over digital.

I bet the development equipment is expensive, right?
__________________
\"...and he shall ascend from the fires of Hell...\"
"everyone knows second hand squirrel kills." - Svosen

3 forum tokens
Gabriel013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2005, 08:14 AM   #104
Norrec
A little left of center
 
Norrec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Streetsboro, OH
Xbox Live ID: xakdublin
Posts: 1,668
Send a message via AIM to Norrec Send a message via MSN to Norrec Send a message via Yahoo to Norrec
Default

I don't own the equipment, other than the film, camera, and paper, I use the schools equipment. But I believe a new enlarger (device you place the negative in, and focus to transfer to the paper, nothing complex, just a light and lens that shine down) can be quite expensive. But, I also think you can get refurbished parts and build your own, good as new, relatively cheap. Also may need a decent air circulation/replacement equipment for any fumes from the chemicals.
Developing fluids though, I'm not really sure of the cost. But in the film developing stage, we use about 5 different chemicals, and in photo development, 3-4. If you can get the most use of each chem, It might not be so bad in anycase.
Eitherway, after I'm done here at school, and when I get my own place, I plan on making a small darkroom of my own. The enlarger and other things are pretty much a one time investment, the chemicals are pretty much the only thing you need to buy more of, unless something breaks and needs replaced.

Actually, I just looked it up, enlargers aren't too bad of a price either. On BHphotovideo.com (awesome photography,video, audio, etc etc etc site) a low end enlarger can be about $170. Highest price average is around $3000 though, and one goes up to $19,000.

We use mostly B&W Beselers, which seem to run $180-900 on this site.
__________________
Norrec is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cell Phones KCAA Off-topic Forum 21 07-09-2004 11:05 AM
Favorite Color... KCAA Off-topic Forum 27 07-08-2004 06:05 AM
Interracial(?)Dating SweetBri Off-topic Forum 21 10-13-2003 04:55 PM
Just got back from New York! Game Developer Off-topic Forum 0 09-07-2003 09:04 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0