Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Koth
I'd leave it gabe, hes just being his usual pissy self and lets not forget this is comming from a guy who doesn't own a PS3 so he must know what hes on about  |
Yes, because memory and storage capacity are something completely irrelevant for a professional computer engineer. I don't deal with that ever, and I'm obviously talking out of my ass. Obviously the years of training and experience have no bearing at all compared to owning a ps3. Only then will I know what I'm talking about.
Let's not forget that your futile argument may be put at the reverse for yourself - could it be that you are such a flamboyant Blu-Ray preacher solely because you own a ps3?
In retrospect, if you had actually read my posts in this thread, I did disprove the fact that Blu-Ray was necessary (because it's a bold word), and the quote that you used for this was completely out of context, as it never stated that Blu-Ray was necessary.
HOWEVER, I did not say that the other consoles' solutions were better, and I did state that they were lacking in critical areas. Just because I don't think is necessary addition for the time being doesn't imply that I think it helps the games at all, and that I'm a ps3 hater and that I will never own one because Sony killed my dog. Obviously, it's better, and I've always stated that it's a nice addition, but I still think that the standard will be viable for most games in the normal console cycle (which the PS3 obviously will not follow).
To put it bluntly, you are a moron and I'm closing this thread.